<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lemaireolivier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lemaireolivier.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lemaireolivier.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on SEM, Online Advertising and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Instant &#8211; Implications for your PPC Campaigns</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/google-instant-implications-for-you-ppc-campaigns/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/google-instant-implications-for-you-ppc-campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google instant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google instant search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google real time search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week google announced that it was rolling out instant search in US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Russia. While we still don’t know exactly what the impact of this new feature is, here are some hints regarding the likely impact on PPC campaigns. <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/google-instant-implications-for-you-ppc-campaigns/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I am back from a nice week in the south of France, it is time to catch up with the ppc news. The big news seems to be Google Instant.<br />
Last week google announced that it was rolling out instant search in US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Russia. Supported browsers include : Chrome v5/6, Firefox v3, Safari v5 for Mac and Internet Explorer v8. </p>
<p>What google instant search does is : 1) to predict what queries you are willing to type when you start typing and 2)  to display results in real time as soon as you start typing. If you want a closer look at how it behaves you can check it at www.google.com/instant.<br />
While we still don’t know exactly what the impact of this new feature is, here are some hints regarding the likely impact on PPC campaigns. Those hints come from different sources listed at the end of this post.</p>
<p><strong>Impression count :</strong></p>
<p>Source : <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-instant-more-innovative-approach.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FATHs+%28Inside+AdWords%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Google Adwords Blog</a></p>
<p>Here is how google will count impressions. </p>
<p>An impression will be counted if :<br />
-	The user hits the « enter » key<br />
-	The user clicks on the « search » button<br />
-	The user clicks on a link in the result page<br />
-	The user stops typing for three or more seconds</p>
<p>Impressions will therefore increase</p>
<p><strong>Search Queries : Long Tail Effect</strong></p>
<p>While the google suggestion feature that suggest queries was a very good thing to push long tail keywords. The fact that results are now displayed in real time could limit the use of long tail keywords.<br />
Indeed, if a user plan to type « paris hotel comparison » and start typing « paris h » and finds a link that interests him based on google instant result for the suggested query « paris hotel », the user might not continue and use « comparison » in his query.</p>
<p><strong>More Control to Google</strong></p>
<p>Source : <a href="http://blog.efrontier.com/insights/2010/09/google-instant-potential-implications-for-the-advertiser.html">EF Blog</a></p>
<p>The fact that the real time results are based on what google suggests, it tempts the user to click on results suggested by google, therefore increasing google’s control.</p>
<p><strong>Brand Keywords appearing more in Suggested terms</strong></p>
<p>Source : <a href="http://blog.efrontier.com/insights/2010/09/google-instant-potential-implications-for-the-advertiser.html">EF Blog</a></p>
<p>Google seems to be giving more distribution for Brand Keywords than other. When you type « tr » the first suggested term is « travelocity » and not « travel » which should clearly be more popular. </p>
<p>That distribution bias will have an effect on :</p>
<p>-	Trafic Distribution<br />
-	Quality Score (if impressions goes up for started queries that where not intended to be branded queries, Brand Impressions will go up and CTR down impacting negatively the QS)</p>
<p><strong>Super Short Tail</strong></p>
<p>Source : <a href="http://www.blackhatppc.co.uk/2010/09/google-instant-search-arise-the-super-short-tail-keyword/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BlackHatPPC+%28Black+Hat+PPC%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Black Hat PPC</a></p>
<p>The guys at black hat PPC suggested that Google Instant is an opportunity for super short keywords. For example, you could buy « tr » as a keyword if your brand is travelocity based on the fact that google will suggest « travelocity » and display results accordingly.<br />
While it make sense in some ways, I am not sure that google will identify « tr » as the real search term and map it back to the keyword « tr ». I rather think that google will report « travelocity » as the search term and map it to the same keyword.</p>
<p>Those are several hints, let&#8217;s see what the data will say in a few weeks.</p>
<p>Related Articles :<br />
Official Announcement: Google Instant: <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-instant-more-innovative-approach.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FATHs+%28Inside+AdWords%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">A More Innovative Approach to Search</a><br />
Dr. Siddharth Shah / EF Blog : <a href="http://blog.efrontier.com/insights/2010/09/google-instant-potential-implications-for-the-advertiser.html">Google Instant: Potential Implications for the Advertiser</a><br />
Black Hatt PPC : <a href="http://www.blackhatppc.co.uk/2010/09/google-instant-search-arise-the-super-short-tail-keyword/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BlackHatPPC+%28Black+Hat+PPC%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Google Instant Search: Arise the “super short tail” keyword<br />
</a></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Google+Instant+%E2%80%93+Implications+for+your+PPC+Campaigns+http://wqfco.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/google-instant-implications-for-you-ppc-campaigns/&amp;t=Google+Instant+%E2%80%93+Implications+for+your+PPC+Campaigns" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/google-instant-implications-for-you-ppc-campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Meet Display (Le Search rencontre le Display)</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/search-meet-display-le-search-rencontre-le-display/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/search-meet-display-le-search-rencontre-le-display/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search meet display]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will be talking at e-commerce Paris on the 23rd of September at 16.45.
During this session, we will cover how search technologies and auction pricing model are now reaching the display world  <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/search-meet-display-le-search-rencontre-le-display/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ecommerce-paris-2010.jpg"><img src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ecommerce-paris-2010.jpg" alt="salon e commerce paris 2010" title="ecommerce-paris-2010" width="305" height="205" class="alignright size-full wp-image-81" /></a><br />
I will be talking at e-commerce Paris on the 23rd of September at 16.45.<br />
During this session, we will cover how search technologies and auction pricing model are now reaching the display world making it a whole lot more efficient and dynamic. </p>
<p>If you want to learn more about this revolution in the Display world, join us on the 23rd of September at e-commerce, room S1 at 16.45. You can register now by following this link: <a href="http://ecommerceparis.com/2010/index.php?option=com_ebsession&#038;id=704&#038;Itemid=93">register</a></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Search+Meet+Display+%28Le+Search+rencontre+le+Display%29+http://dtqn4.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/search-meet-display-le-search-rencontre-le-display/&amp;t=Search+Meet+Display+%28Le+Search+rencontre+le+Display%29" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/search-meet-display-le-search-rencontre-le-display/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Acquisitions Timeline</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/google-acquisitions-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/google-acquisitions-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timeline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I am thinking of a good subject for my next blogpost, I thought I would share with you this very intresting Timeline of Google&#8217;s Acquisition over time. It graphically shows Size, Interest, Price&#8230; Looks to me like it is &#8230; <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/google-acquisitions-timeline/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am thinking of a good subject for my next blogpost, I thought I would share with you this very intresting Timeline of Google&#8217;s Acquisition over time. It graphically shows Size, Interest, Price&#8230; </p>
<p>Looks to me like it is very complete and an intresting read. Congrats to <a href="http://scores.org">scores.org</a> and <a href="http://byjess.net">byjess.net</a> for puting this together</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scores.org/graphics/google/"><img src="http://www.scores.org/graphics/google/google-acquisition.jpg" border="0" alt="Google Acquisitions." /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.scores.org/graphics/">Research</a> by <a href="http://www.scores.org/">Scores.org</a></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Google+Acquisitions+Timeline+http://7ih8i.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/google-acquisitions-timeline/&amp;t=Google+Acquisitions+Timeline" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/google-acquisitions-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Match me if you can, &#8230; and if I want &#8211; Google&#8217;s New Modified Broad Match and what to do with it</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/match-me-if-you-can-and-if-i-want-googles-new-modified-broad-match-and-what-to-do-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/match-me-if-you-can-and-if-i-want-googles-new-modified-broad-match-and-what-to-do-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Match Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modified Broad Match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced in may the release of a new match type, but it is only recently that they released for the rest of Europe. In this blogpost, I will try to look at how this match type works and what are it's pro's and con's. Feel free to comment on this! <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/match-me-if-you-can-and-if-i-want-googles-new-modified-broad-match-and-what-to-do-with-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/logo-google-love.png"><img src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/logo-google-love.png" alt="Google Love Logo" title="Google Love" width="243" height="99" class="alignright size-full wp-image-66" /></a><br />
Google <a href="http://bit.ly/agZx2i ">announced</a> in may the release of a new match type, but it is only recently that they released for the rest of Europe. In this blogpost, I will try to look at how this match type works and what are it&#8217;s pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s. Feel free to comment on this!</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s the Modified Broad Match</strong></p>
<p>First let&#8217;s quickly recap what broad, phrase and exact match types are all about:</p>
<p><a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MatchTypes1.gif"><img src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MatchTypes1.gif" alt="Comparison of Google Broad, Phrase and Exact Match Types" title="Comparison of Google Broad, Phrase and Exact Match Types" width="695" height="329" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-58" /></a></p>
<p>With the table above you will have understand that the Broad Match type will not give you a lot of control on the queries you are being matched to.</p>
<p>The modified broad match targeting is basically a broad match with more control. It gives the ability to have a keyword in broad match but limit the scope of this broad match to certain terms contained in your keyword and at the same time it is not as restrictive as Broad or Phrase. </p>
<p><strong>How it works</strong></p>
<p>To activate it you just need to buy your keyword in broad match and add a &#8220;+&#8221; in front of the term for which you want to restrict the broad matching to plurals and misspellings. </p>
<p><a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MatchTypes2.gif"><img src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MatchTypes2.gif" alt="Comparison of the Broad and the Modified Broad Match Type" title="Comparison of the Broad and the Modified Broad Match Type" width="806" height="261" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-59" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Pro&#8217;s </strong></p>
<p><em>1. Control over your ads and landing pages relevancy</em></p>
<p>With Google broad match type getting broader and broader, this option will give you all the controls you need to ensure well-targeted ads and landing pages. What&#8217;s more frustrating than having a page dedicated to Italy but not using it because all &#8220;flights to italy&#8221; queries are being broad matched to your &#8220;flight to Rome&#8221; keywords that have a better QS and a higher CPC?</p>
<p><em>2. Control your investment</em></p>
<p>While broad matching is a pretty nice option to ensure that you have as much traffic as you can, it represents a risk in terms of performance measurement and CPC adjustment. Let&#8217;s take an example of queries that can be broad matched to &#8220;flight to Rome&#8221; and their performances over a certain timeframe</p>
<p><a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MatchTypes3.gif"><img src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MatchTypes3.gif" alt="How Search Queries can Influence a Keyword Performance" title="How Search Queries can Influence a Keyword Performance" width="385" height="253" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-60" /></a></p>
<p>You can easily see that, the negative performance of the queries “Flight to Milan” and “Flight to Italy” are clearly affecting and screwing the data for the keyword “flight to Rome” on which the CPA (in exact match) is 20 euros. Compare this to the 28,92 euros that you think you have due to non-requested queries being matched to it and you will directly understand why more restrictive match type are useful.</p>
<p>By knowing the true value of a keyword you will be able to distribute your budget in the most efficient way.</p>
<p><em>3. Scale your campaigns easily</em></p>
<p>The major drawback of using negative keywords to control your traffic is the amount of work it requires. Let’s take an easy example; if you have 10 adgroups (one destination you cover), you want to include all destinations in all adgroups as a negative excepted the destination covered by each individual adgroup. So with 10 adgroups you end up having 10*9 = 90 negative keywords. Now imagine you are a big travel company with 400 destinations, that’s 400*399 = 159 600 negative keywords. Now, if you are detailed and you have variation of each adgroup per destination, let’s say one for lastminute, one for cheap and one for more generic terms, that is 400*3*399 = 478 800 negative keywords to have. Add to that the fact that google limits the number of keywords in each account at 1 million and you will quickly ends up with an issue of scalability.</p>
<p>The modified broad match will help you limit the number of negative keywords needed and therefore help you scale your campaigns easily.</p>
<p><strong>Con&#8217;s</strong></p>
<p><em>1. Limit you visibility</em></p>
<p>It is common practice to use modified broad match targeting as a starting point in order to collect Search Queries Data and then use those data to enrich your keywords listing (and to add negative keywords). If you don’t use modified broad keywords well, you might end up by not having visibility anymore on those queries and therefore limit the possibility of increasing your keywords reach.</p>
<p>For example, you know for sure that you don’t want to appear on “Cheap Flight to Italy” when you are buying the term “Cheap Flight to Rome”. But, as you don’t have “discount” keywords for Rome, you still want to appear on the query “Discount Flight to Rome”.</p>
<p>If you don’t use modified broad match well and use this keywords “+Cheap +Flight to +Rome” you will end up loosing the query “Discount Flight to Rome”. To avoid this you should us: “Cheap Flight to +Rome” which will leave some freedom to “Cheap Flight To” but will restrict “Rome” to misspellings and plurals. </p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>In my opinion the “modified broad” match type is an excellent new feature that will help search marketers target more precisely their traffic and therefore be more relevant while remaining able to scale their campaigns and gain a lot of time. On the other hand, if not used well, it could result in complete blindness towards queries that could have been added as keywords and increase your reach.</p>
<p>It is definitely a good additional match type but you should take your time and think about the consequences it can have before implementing it.</p>
<p>Feel free to post your comments below if you agree, disagree or want to complete this post.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Match+me+if+you+can%2C+%E2%80%A6+and+if+I+want+%E2%80%93+Google%E2%80%99s+New+Modified+Broad+Match+and+what+to+do+with+it+http://xoxdn.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/match-me-if-you-can-and-if-i-want-googles-new-modified-broad-match-and-what-to-do-with-it/&amp;t=Match+me+if+you+can%2C+%E2%80%A6+and+if+I+want+%E2%80%93+Google%E2%80%99s+New+Modified+Broad+Match+and+what+to+do+with+it" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/match-me-if-you-can-and-if-i-want-googles-new-modified-broad-match-and-what-to-do-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buying Brands on Google Adwords, now you can do it!</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/buying-brands-on-google-adwords-now-you-can-do-it/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/buying-brands-on-google-adwords-now-you-can-do-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Trademark Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Google announced that starting on the 14 of September you will now be able to purchase trademarked terms as keywords whether or not you are the trademark owner. This changes apply to EU countries and aims at unifying Google&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/buying-brands-on-google-adwords-now-you-can-do-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Google announced that starting on the 14 of September you will now be able to purchase trademarked terms as keywords whether or not you are the trademark owner. This changes apply to EU countries and aims at unifying Google&#8217;s trademark policy. Indeed, this was already applied in the UK for one year. </p>
<p>It is important to note that while you will be able to buy trademarked terms as keyword you will still not be allowed to include trademarked terms in your adcopy. </p>
<p>Google will also bring one major modification to it&#8217;s UK Trademark policy on the 14 of September. Starting  on that date you will be able to use trademarked terms in you adcopy. </p>
<p>You can find more information about this change and the likely effects it will have on <a href="http://blog.efrontier.com/insights/2010/08/google-changing-its-trademark-policy-in-eu-and-uk.html">my company&#8217;s blog</a></p>
<p>The original communication from Google is available <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/08/update-to-canadian-uk-and-ireland-ad.html">here</a> </p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Buying+Brands+on+Google+Adwords%2C+now+you+can+do+it%21+http://e7o2k.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/buying-brands-on-google-adwords-now-you-can-do-it/&amp;t=Buying+Brands+on+Google+Adwords%2C+now+you+can+do+it%21" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/buying-brands-on-google-adwords-now-you-can-do-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Slowly but surely Replacing the mouse by fingers</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/apple-slowly-but-surely-replacing-the-mouse-by-fingers/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/apple-slowly-but-surely-replacing-the-mouse-by-fingers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic trackpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent release of the Magic Trackpad from Apple, everybody seems to agree that Apple is slowly replacing the mouse ( MacApper,TheAppleBlog )! Instead of launching an all touch sensitive computer or super expensive living room touch table (ie &#8230; <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/apple-slowly-but-surely-replacing-the-mouse-by-fingers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent release of the Magic Trackpad from Apple, everybody seems to agree that Apple is slowly replacing the mouse ( <a href="http://macapper.com/2010/07/28/magic-trackpad%E2%80%99s-goal-replace-the-mouse/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+macapper+%28MacApper%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">MacApper</a>,<a href="http://theappleblog.com/2010/07/28/apple-future-computer-mice/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheAppleBlog+%28TheAppleBlog%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">TheAppleBlog</a> )!</p>
<p>Instead of launching an all touch sensitive computer or super expensive living room touch table (ie Microsoft Surface), Apple is slowly changing it&#8217;s customer habits by educating them to use their fingers as input devices. It started with laptop trackpads, then keyboards got slimmer and only requesting a tiny pressure, followed by iPhone &#038; iPod Touch Sensitive Screens. After that the iPad was released and now the Desktop Mac has it&#8217;s own touch input device that can literally replace the mouse. </p>
<p>While Apple could simply have replaced the mouse by the Magic Trackpad, they have chosen to launch the product and see how people adopt it, but they are getting prepared to replace the mouse. Guess what, the new iMac keyboard box has an empty space that fits exactly the Magic Trackpad size. It won&#8217;t be long before the Magic Trackpad become the default pointing device on all Mac. </p>
<p>To be honest I have bought a Magic Mouse and it is definitely the best mouse I ever had but I do want to replace it with the Magic Trackpad. </p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Apple+Slowly+but+surely+Replacing+the+mouse+by+fingers+http://qi2zy.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/apple-slowly-but-surely-replacing-the-mouse-by-fingers/&amp;t=Apple+Slowly+but+surely+Replacing+the+mouse+by+fingers" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/apple-slowly-but-surely-replacing-the-mouse-by-fingers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Affiliates buying your Brand in SEM</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/affiliates-buying-your-brand-in-sem/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/affiliates-buying-your-brand-in-sem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand keywords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the search world it is very common to see your affiliate buying your brand while it is clearly specified in the affiliate program that they can't. The idea is that they buy very cheap conversions using your brand then resell it to you at the usual CPA that you have in your affiliate program. <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/affiliates-buying-your-brand-in-sem/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week it happened again! I have spotted an affiliate who was literally stealing traffic from one of my clients on a brand keyword. </p>
<p><img alt="Stealing" src="http://www.seo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/burglar.gif" title="Burglar" class="alignright" width="373" height="300" /></p>
<p><strong>Here are the different effects that it can have:</strong></p>
<p>- You loose your brand traffic through SEM<br />
- You pay to buy those lost conversions through your affiliate program at the usual CPA<br />
- If they bid more than you and are using your display URL, your add may not appear<br />
- You don&#8217;t have any control over the message you display on the SERP</p>
<p><strong>Affiliate Tricks</strong></p>
<p>- regional targeting: if they know that your office is located let&#8217;s say in Paris, they target the rest of France but not Paris so you can&#8217;t see them<br />
- day parting: they turn their campaigns on after office hours so you are less likely to spot them<br />
- language settings: they target other languages than the main language<br />
- adcopy: they use the same adcopy as yours so you don&#8217;t realize it is not yours</p>
<p><strong>How to spot them</strong></p>
<p>- keep a close eye on your brand performance, if there are unexplicable behaviour, think about affiliates<br />
- use the <a href="https://adwords.google.co.uk/select/AdTargetingPreviewTool">AdPreviewTool</a> in Google, to emulate a search query with different geo &#038; languages targeting<br />
- use hours/hours reporting once in a while to check if nothing strange happens after office hours<br />
- click on your brand ads once in a while to check the tracking code on the URL, this will help you spot affiliate using the same adcopy as yours<br />
- in google adwords, check the status of your brand keywords and if the following comment appear &#8220;your ad is not displayed as there is another keyword with the same display URL&#8221; think about affiliates.</p>
<p>Alternatively you can invest in some competitors watching technologies that can also identify Affiliates.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Affiliates+buying+your+Brand+in+SEM+http://7qosb.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/affiliates-buying-your-brand-in-sem/&amp;t=Affiliates+buying+your+Brand+in+SEM" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/affiliates-buying-your-brand-in-sem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q2 &#8211; UK Search Engine Report</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/q2-uk-search-engine-report/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/q2-uk-search-engine-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adcenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficient frontier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search Engine report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lemaireolivier.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Efficient Frontier recently released its UK Q2 search engine report, with the time this report has become a piece of analysis that the industry expect to see every quarter as it provides great inside on the market trends! Let me &#8230; <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/q2-uk-search-engine-report/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Efficient Frontier recently released its UK Q2 search engine report, with the time this report has become a piece of analysis that the industry expect to see every quarter as it provides great inside on the market trends!  </p>
<p>Let me share with you some results of this study.  </p>
<p>1. Year on Year spend is up 10% but Quarter on Quarter spend is stable    </p>
<p>2. CPCs are still low compared to last year, certainly on Google and Yahoo with a drop of more than 20% but Quarter on Quarter the CPCs are rising across all Search Engines.  This can bring us to the conclusion that overall search volume and clicks have increased while the willingness of advertiser to chase clients and sales aggressively is still lower than last year given the economic climate.      </p>
<p>3. ROI is stable with only a little 1% drop year on year and quarter on quarter.   </p>
<p>4. The report predicts a 10-15% growth again this year in spend.    </p>
<p>If you would like to consult the full version of the report you can download it here:  <a href="http://www.efrontier.com/research/search-engine-report/Q2-2010-UK">report</a></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Q2+%E2%80%93+UK+Search+Engine+Report+http://zahzt.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/q2-uk-search-engine-report/&amp;t=Q2+%E2%80%93+UK+Search+Engine+Report" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/q2-uk-search-engine-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s First Shanghai Store vs Apple&#8217;s Second Parisian Store</title>
		<link>http://lemaireolivier.com/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://lemaireolivier.com/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Store]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Monday I had the chance to visit Apple&#8217;s new Parisian store @ Opera. This store takes place in a typical parisian building that looks like a real hotel. While the Opara store mixes old parisian style and brand new &#8230; <a href="http://lemaireolivier.com/hello-world/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Monday I had the chance to visit Apple&#8217;s new Parisian store @ Opera. This store takes place in a typical parisian building that looks like a real hotel. While the Opara store mixes old parisian style and brand new technologies, the new Shanghai store that will open this saturday is just based on modern architecture.</p>
<p>The two pictures  below show just how Apple can turn totally different sites into magnificent retail stores.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Apple Shangai Store" src="http://shanghaiist.com/upload/2010/07/applestore_SH02.JPG" alt="First Apple Shangai Store" width="490" height="325" /><em>Apple Store / Shangai</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Apple Store Opera" src="http://micheldeguilhermier.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5bbe53ef013485287213970c-800wi" alt="Magasin Apple Opera" width="490" height="337" /><em>Apple Store &#8211; Paris / Opéra</em></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Apple%E2%80%99s+First+Shanghai+Store+vs+Apple%E2%80%99s+Second+Parisian+Store+http://6ic7f.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://lemaireolivier.com/hello-world/&amp;t=Apple%E2%80%99s+First+Shanghai+Store+vs+Apple%E2%80%99s+Second+Parisian+Store" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lemaireolivier.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lemaireolivier.com/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

